4 months ago
2
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that advocates cannot usage the Right to Information (RTI) Act to question details regarding cases they are handling for clients, observing that utilizing the transparency instrumentality successful this mode fails to beforehand its halfway objectives.
Dismissing a 2nd entreaty filed by an advocator successful a quality related to the termination of a fruits-and-vegetables proviso declaration astatine a Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya successful Haryana, Information Commissioner Sudha Rani Relangi noted that the appellant had sought accusation "on behalf of his brother, who utilized to beryllium supplier of vegetables/fruits to the responsive nationalist authority".
The committee said successful the lack of immoderate mentation arsenic to wherefore the supplier himself could not question the information, "it appears that the appellant has sought accusation connected behalf of his lawsuit per se, which is not permissible".
Quoting a Madras High Court order, the CIC underlined that "a practising advocator cannot question accusation relating to the cases instituted by him connected behalf of his client".
The precocious tribunal had cautioned that otherwise, "every practising advocator would invoke the provisions of the RTI Act for getting accusation connected behalf of his client", which "does not beforehand the objects of the strategy of the RTI Act".
The committee further quoted the ruling to accent that the "laudable objectives of the RTI Act cannot beryllium utilized for idiosyncratic ends and should not go a instrumentality successful the hands of the advocator for seeking each kinds of accusation successful bid to beforehand his practice".
Taking enactment of the claims made by the nationalist authorization that respective records were destroyed successful a occurrence and that idiosyncratic accusation was rightly denied nether exemptions, the CIC said it recovered "no infirmity successful the reply furnished by the CPIO".
The entreaty was accordingly disposed of, with a absorption to stock copies of written submissions with the appellant.
