6 months ago
1
About 10 years aft a pupil of Gnanambikai Government Arts College for Women successful Mayiladuthurai fell to decease connected the campus, the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) connected Monday (November 17, 2025) recommended that the Tamil Nadu authorities wage a compensation of ₹3 lakh to her ineligible heirs. The Commission had taken suo motu cognisance of a study successful The Hindu dated October 14, 2015.
According to the report, 19-year-old Ramya, on with her person Shanmugapriya, had gone to the terrace of the college. Unaware of their presence, the watchman had locked the doors. Growing anxious, they had attempted to ascent down utilizing a dupatta. In their attempt, Ramya had mislaid her equilibrium and fell.
She had been taken to the Mayiladuthurai Government Hospital and past to Thanjavur Medical College Hospital, wherever she had died. The constabulary had registered a case.
The Commission called for reports from the Director of Collegiate Education, Nagapattinam Superintendent of Police, and the Principal, Gnanambikai Government Arts College for Women. Considering the fatal incidental and the circumstances that led to it, the Commission said determination was “clear negligence” connected the portion of the assemblage authorities, arsenic good arsenic the Director of Collegiate Education, which amounted to a usurpation of quality rights of the victim.
Observing it was a lawsuit of accidental autumn and death, the Commission said it needed to beryllium considered whether the circumstances starring to the decease occurred owed to the negligent enactment of the deceased oregon by the assemblage authorities. “No enquiry was conducted into whether the watchman oregon the authorities had checked the terrace country oregon different places regarding the beingness of immoderate students,” the Commission said.
The Commission felt that the cognition of the responsive officers and the mode they had submitted the study showed “they are not superior successful the decease of a young girl.” It further pointed retired nary enquiry was conducted implicit the death, and nary compensation was awarded. It termed arsenic “negligent” the enactment of the assemblage authorities, including the watchman and the Director of Collegiate Education, who had “no involvement to person compensation from the acrophobic authorization for the decease of the pupil and manus implicit the aforesaid to the ineligible heirs.”
It further held that the assemblage authorities, arsenic good arsenic the Director of Collegiate Education, had violated the quality rights of the deceased, and so, the ineligible heirs of the deceased were entitled to get compensation. Citing the judgement successful the D.K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal case, it said: “So this Commission is of the considered sentiment that the ineligible heirs of the deceased are entitled to person compensation and fixing of ₹3 lakh arsenic compensation to them would beryllium just and tenable and would conscionable the ends of justice.”
